PRESS RELEASE
28/02/2003

Local authorities in the European Union in good financial health despite catching a slight cold in 2001

 

Following on from its publication of 'Local authority finances in the fifteen countries of the European Union' which presents a detailed comparative analysis backed up by monographs for each country, Dexia today presents an update of the situation.

The main trends apparent between 1996 and 2001 continue to hold good:

  • The essential role played by local authorities

Local authorities in the European Union spent 987 billion euros in 2001, or 11.2% of European GDP. That percentage rises in countries that are going through a process of devolution - such as Italy and Spain.

The role played by the public sector at local authority level is particularly important when it comes to investment. In 2001 that amounted to 134 billion euros - or 66.1% of all public sector investment in Europe.

  • Local authority finances still in fairly good shape even though circumstances have become more difficult

Since 1997 the local authority sector in Europe has on the whole produced budget surpluses as a result of pursuing policies designed to put an end to public sector borrowing and public sector budget deficits.

However a slight downturn was observed in 2001, when the aggregate budget surplus by local authorities dropped to 4.1 billion euros from 5.1 billion euros in 2000. That trend is likely to continue in 2002 because of the decline in the economy and the fall in local tax revenues in certain countries, notably Germany.

The update also makes it possible to compare the position of local authorities in Belgium with those in other European countries:

  • Spending by local authorities in Belgium (16.6 billion euros in 2001, i.e. 6.5% of the country's GDP that year) is below the European average (11.2% GDP). This is partly the result of the greater powers exercised by the local authorities in other counties (where they are responsible, for instance, for paying teachers and running hospitals), and partly due to Belgium's federal structure: certain powers which lie with the Regions or the Communities are exercised in other countries by the local authorities.
  • Investment by the local authorities (2 billion euros in 2001, or 0.8% GDP) is also below the European average (1.5%). This too is due to the federal structure of the country: investment by the Regions and the Communities (1.5 billion euros) is about the same as that by the local authorities and the provinces. Furthermore this is the ratio for 2001, a year after the elections when traditionally investment is low. Even so, compared with other federal states (Germany and Austria), local authority investment in Belgium in 2001 (0.8 % GDP) was at around the same level as Austria (0.7% GDP).
  • Tax revenue by the local authorities in Belgium is not very high, representing 2.1% GDP (as opposed to 4.2% in Europe) and 500 euros per inhabitant (as opposed to 1,000 euros at European level). The differences with the other countries is due in particular to the high level of tax that the local authorities are able to raise in certain countries like Spain and Italy - two countries where substantial powers have been devolved to the regional authorities along with the transfer of powers to raise taxes.
  • In 2001 the aggregate local authority budget closed on a slight deficit (-0.3 billion euros, or -0.1% GDP). Belgium is therefore close to the European aggregate, a very slight surplus of +0.05% GDP. In 2002, the aggregate local authority budget also showed a slight surplus.
  • Local authority public sector debt in Belgium amounted to 15 billion euros in 2001 or 5.8% GDP. This is close to the European average of 5.6% GDP that year. It is worth bearing in mind that Belgian public sector debt has been falling since 1996 (when it was equal to 7% GDP).